Michael Vick's recent testimony of his Christian faith and belief in God took me a little by surprise.  I mean, who would have known?  I was genuinely moved to laughter!  I think even Johnny Cochran was rolling over in his grave. 

You go boy!!!




Vick's Christian testimony.  I don't ever remember this guy mentioning God before.  It sounds like a regular Bible revival meeting at a river crossing.

Oh... the irony of it all!!!

Listen to V-103 Porsche Foxx Exclusive Interview with Michael Vick:




Here is another interesting picture of Vick.  The significance of this photo is now all to clear.

Come visit my new blog dedicated to immigration issues.  While I have enjoyed posting over here at Townhall this a very limiting blog as far as what you can do and publish.  I will continue to post here on other issues involving the war ect.

Just Build The Fence

This is one of the more shocking stories I have read so far about the WMD's that we know existed in Iraq before the war started.  While it answers many question it leaves many unanswered.  Like who knew what and when did they know.


U.S. agent says Iraqis led him to Saddam's WMD

By William Hargrave


This claim comes from Dave Gaubatz, who served for 12 years as an agent in the U.S. Air Force’s Office of Special Investigations. He says he was "hand-picked" to locate weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Between March and July 2003, he identified several of Saddam Hussein’s WMD sites in the immediate aftermath of the Iraq invasion.

Where were they? Huge caches were located within the city limits of the southern Iraqi city of Nasariyah, and were also discovered in another location 15 to 20 miles south of Nasariyah between two canals and near Um Qasr in the Basra region 284 miles south of Baghdad.

Some of this information has been published by The Spectator (London), The New York Sun, and other U.S. newspapers and Internet news sites. But the mainstream media have chosen not to inform readers and viewers of the credible reports of WMDs discovered in Iraq.

According to these reports, Saddam’s WMDs were apparently smuggled to Syria, Iran and other destinations under the nose of American forces. The political fallout that would occur from investigation and affirmation of this extremely serious American operational failure with its profound military and geo-strategic implications has apparently helped to keep a lid on this information—until now.

Gaubatz appealed to Congress to investigate his claims. But neither political party wishes to touch the issue for different reasons. The Democrats do not want the public to know that President Bush’s stated reason for invading Iraq might be justified. The Republicans do not want Americans to know that the administration's military command failed to stop what may have been the biggest WMD transfer of all time.

The issue is, as The Spectator put it, “an axis of embarrassment.”

At the start of the 2003 invasion, Gaubatz was sent to Nasariyah to locate possible WMD sites and ascertain threats to U.S. interests in the area. Fluent in Arabic, Gaubatz was able to meet numerous locals who told him he had struck gold: the WMDs were actually close by in farms and marshes. Some were buried in concrete bunkers 20-30 feet beneath the Euphrates River. These were vaults with 5-foot-thick concrete walls beneath the river bed.

“These were under 25 feet of water,” Gaubatz said in an interview with Insight. “Saddam didn’t care about poisoning the water of southern Iraq."

“They took us to the sites, we took photos and grid coordinates,” he said. “The missile imprints were still in the sand. Based on the detail they provided and what was confirmed by others, I felt 100 percent confident WMDs were at the locations identified. The Iraqis told us we must either excavate the sites and remove the WMDs or our enemies would.”

Along with Gaubatz, a group of U.S. Office of Special Investigations (OSI) agents visited the sites and got what his doctor later told him was radiation sickness from all the contaminants in the air and the water.

The U.S., however, did not investigate these locations. Other nations did.

The failure to find significant stockpiles of chemical, biological or nuclear weapons has proved a massive public relations problem for the Americans and the British, whose intelligence indicating that Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein did possess WMD stockpiles was one of their primary justifications for the invasion of Iraq.

How credible is the source?

“Mr. Gaubatz is not some marginal figure,” said Melanie Phillips, a columnist for London’s Daily Mail newspaper, in a recent piece on Saddam’s secret WMD bunkers for The Spectator, a weekly British conservative magazine. “He’s pretty well as near to the horse’s mouth as you can get.”

Gaubatz is a sandy-haired man who’s been stationed as a federal agent at nuclear sites stateside and then as a U.S. Air Force special agent overseas. He is widely regarded as one of America’s most capable and experienced intelligence officials. According to Phillips, Gaubatz was decorated in 2001 for being the “lead agent in a classified investigation, arguably the most sensitive counter-intelligence investigation currently in the entire Department of Defense.” Because his “reports were such high quality, many were published in the Air Force’s daily threat product for senior USAF leaders or re-transmitted at the national level to all security agencies in the U.S. government.”

After 20 years on active duty service in counterintelligence work (12 of them as an OSI agent), he retired, and then obtained a position as a civilian Federal Agent with the Air Force (OSI). He was specifically chosen to go to Nasariyah in Iraq to locate Saddam’s WMD sites and discover threats to U.S. forces in the area. He saw mass Shi’ite graves of women holding their babies in their arms. He met Muslims who told him they were being recruited for terrorist cells. Every time he stumbled on a factoid, he sent a memo to the Iraq Survey Group (ISG), a group of more than 1,000 Americans, Brits and Australians whose job it was back in 2003 to locate the WMDs.

Between March and July 2003, Gaubatz says he was taken by local Iraqis to four suspected WMD sites — two within Nasariyah, one just south of the city, and another one near Basra. He says Iraqi sources told him the sites contained biological and chemical weapons, missiles and material for a nuclear program. Gaubatz said he was sure he found the WMD sites because the Iraqi government had obviously gone to considerable lengths to conceal the bunkers. Three of the bunkers were buried 20 to 30 feet under the Euphrates River.

Gaubatz was told by American environmental engineers that the parts of the Euphrates and Tigris rivers near the sites showed abnormally high radiation levels. Gaubatz and his team had also been exposed to radioactive substances and he still suffers unexplained headaches and nausea.

Gaubatz asked his superiors for heavy equipment to be brought in from Kuwait so the bunkers could be excavated. The response was that there weren’t enough soldiers available to secure them.

“People were putting their lives on the line showing us those sites,” he said, adding that some of his informants have since been kidnapped, tortured, and then killed. “But they [the superiors] told me they didn’t have the manpower or equipment to do so, plus it wasn’t safe. Well, war is never safe.”

Moreover, the conventional understanding was that the WMDs were further to the north. Gaubatz had already sent some 60 classified intelligence reports to Prince Sultan Air Base, an American base in Saudi Arabia. When he returned to the United States, he contacted two Republican congressmen: Reps. Pete Hoekstra of Michigan and Curt Weldon of Pennsylvania. Interested, they tried to follow up on his information by accessing the 60 intelligence reports. But not only had all the reports Gaubatz had sent to Saudi Arabia mysteriously disappeared, their intended audience, the ISG, never saw them. The congressmen tried extracting information from the Defense Department and the CIA as to how this was allowed to happen, but were stonewalled.

Gaubatz has since learned the sites have been looted and an unknown amount of the weapons carried off. Now, he says, the U.S. has an even more difficult task: Figuring out exactly where the WMDs are and proving they were transported there from Iraq. He says the WMDs were there for the finding not so long ago, but the U.S military totally underestimated what it would take to locate them.

“There weren’t enough soldiers to secure the borders, much less exploit the sites,” he said.

“The Americans were not prepared. They were overwhelmed. It was a Katrina of war,” Gaubatz said, referring to the massive August 2005 hurricane that wiped out much of New Orleans.

"We witnessed thousands of Iranians pouring into southern Iraq," he said. "We were told by Iraqis the Iranians' intent was to initiate a civil war."

Gaubatz says his team "immediately" reported this important intelligence to the Pentagon and the CIA, but "it was never followed up on."

"The Iranians were taking over Shi'ite-dominated southern Iraq," he said.

Internet news sites cited reports in 2003 that U.S. intelligence believed Saddam’s WMDs were moved west to Lebanon’s heavily fortified Bekaa Valley, a beehive of Hezbollah forces, Iranians and Syrians. Also, prominent Washington journalist Bill Gertz has reported on the stream of tractor-trailer trucks the CIA spotted moving from Iraq to Lebanon via Syria in early 2003. Russian military advisors and special forces helped move the poison gas components, missile parts, nuclear-related equipment, tank and aircraft parts. Some of the WMDs could have also been trucked eastward into Iran. Why were the Russians so anxious to get the incriminating materials out before the Americans arrived? Perhaps because much of it was manufactured by them or Eastern European nations such as Ukraine, Bulgaria and Belarus.

Oddly, the United States has not publicized this huge arms transfer. Gertz reported that John Shaw, a deputy undersecretary of state who in October 2004 leaked information to the media of Russia’s involvement in the truck convoys, was forced to resign on Dec. 10 of that year. The reason: “exceeding his authority” in releasing the information, according to the Pentagon.

Gaubatz says that, while in Iraq, he was continuously mistaken by locals for being a Russian. This was because prior to the U.S. invasion, the locals said they saw numerous Russians coming in and out of the area.

The likelihood that WMDs were successfully spirited out of Iraq was also addressed in a 2006 book, “Saddam’s Secrets,” by former Iraqi fighter pilot and Gen. Georges Sada. He says not only were many of the WMDs driven out in large 18-wheeler trucks to Syria, but some WMDs were also flown out.

“I know the names of some of those who were involved in smuggling WMDs out of Iraq in 2002 and 2003,” Sada wrote. “I know the names of officers from the front company, SES, who received the weapons from Saddam. I know how and when they were transported and shipped out of Iraq. And I know how many aircraft were actually used and what types of planes they were.”

Gaubatz has learned through his Iraqi sources that some time after his 2003 visit, someone brought in heavy equipment and got the weapons out of the Euphrates bunkers and other nearby sites. With notebooks showing the site coordinates in hand, he meticulously makes his case.

“Take me back to those sites and let’s see what’s there now,” he says. “It won’t be a popular thing to say the enemy has taken these WMDs. You’d at least find the footprints: labs and storage.”

"I have been informed by Israeli intelligence and learned through British intelligence that the intelligence on WMDs our team provided in 2003 was accurate," he said.

Gaubatz almost got a chance to go back a year ago when then-Congressman Curt Weldon expressed interest in visiting the sites. About nine Iraqis who had helped Gaubatz locate the sites had been given asylum in the U.S. after word leaked out that they were helping the Americans. According to e-mails showing correspondence between him and Weldon’s chief of staff, Russ Caso, Weldon met with some of these Iraqis. His office then thought up a plan: Weldon and Hoekstra, who was then the chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, would travel to Iraq on a junket, but detour to a WMD site. If they could get the military to produce some heavy equipment and security, Weldon would be present during the excavations. If nothing was found, the trip would remain secret. If WMDs were found, the congressmen would alert the media that they had happened upon the strategic sites.

Then Gaubatz got word that Weldon did not want to alert rival Democrats, the Pentagon or even intelligence officials about the trip. He backed out.

“It was going to be this big private trip,” Gaubatz said, “but they were offering no protection for the Iraqi witnesses.”

Weldon, who lost his election race in 2006, now heads up a company called Defense Solutions. He did not respond to e-mails and phone calls from Insight. Neither did former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, who had previously spoken out about the presence of WMDs in Iraq. A spokesman for Hoekstra referred all calls to the House Intelligence Committee, whose spokesman, Jamal Ware, also declined to respond to questions.

Gaubatz is disturbed by what he sees as a government effort to bury the story. He reports being interviewed in March by talk show host Glenn Beck for a one-hour segment to appear on CNN's Headline News. Gaubatz was with an Iraqi contact for the show. The Iraqi, who was part of the federal witness protection program, got calls from the FBI telling him they should stop the interview from being broadcast. The interview was not shown. Gaubatz says the FBI used security concerns as a justification for leaning on Beck's people, but the Iraqi had spoken out on these issues before and there had been no problems.

The real problem was, Gaubatz says, that "with me and the Iraqi source going public about this, it would open a can of worms on the WMD issue. Weldon and Russ Caso [Weldon's chief of staff] keep on telling me not to anger the wrong people."

Gaubatz rues the fact that many people in Iraq — Americans and Iraqis alike — have risked their lives to reveal priceless intelligence information to U.S. policymakers. But in the sieve that is America’s intelligence apparatus, the most important information gets filtered out so that the president and members of Congress have critical gaps in understanding events on the ground. Weldon and Hoekstra, Gaubatz said, had no idea that WMDs were sitting in Iraq waiting to be found until he took the initiative to approach them.

“I was hand-picked to go to Iraq and locate WMD sites,” Gaubatz says. “The sites at a minimum should have been searched when I and my team identified them. I put my life on the line everyday to go out into Iraq. Many troops did lose their lives. If one of the primary reasons we went to war was because of Saddam having WMDs, we should have done our jobs and excavated the sites before our enemy did.”

One congressman who supports Gaubatz on the record is Rep. Virgil Goode, a Republican whose U.S. House seat represents a district in southern Virginia where Gaubatz grew up. In an interview, Goode says he remembered mentioning WMDs to the House Intelligence Committee, but his inquiries—like so many—went nowhere.

“I believe he saw something,” Goode said of Gaubatz. “I think a whole lot of members of Congress have bought the national news media line that there were no WMDs there.”

Four years into the war, Gaubatz says, “The Republicans want to forget this. They don’t want to know if there were WMDs because if there were, they blew it and the WMDs are not accounted for.”

“And the Democrats have Bush in a hot box. Why would they want to change that?”

- Katharine Harris contributed to this report.

Resources:

-- "I found Saddam’s WMD bunkers," The Spectator, April 20, 2007

-- "I found Saddam's WMD bunkers," full article, MelaniePhillips.com

-- "Ex-Officer Spurned on WMD Claim," New York Sun, Feb. 8, 2006

-- United Nations Security Council Report, May 28, 2004

-- "UN inspectors: Saddam shipped out WMD before war and after," WorldTribune.com, June 11, 2004

-- "Report: U.S suspects Iraqi WMD in Lebanon's Bekaa Valley," WorldTribune.com, Aug. 26, 2003

-- "Russia tied to Iraq's missing arms," The Washington Times, Oct. 28, 2004

-- "Photos point to removal of weapons," The Washington Times, Oct. 29, 2004
-- "2 Russian generals given awards in Iraq on war eve," The Washington Times, Oct. 30, 2004

-- "Pentagon ousts official who tied Russia, Iraq arms," The Washington Times, Dec. 30, 2004


SOURCE: www.insightmag.com - June 4-11, 2007, Posted On: 6/4/2007

Well, this has been an eventful three weeks to say the least.  While engaged in a knock down battle with the defeat-o-crats on the fate of the Iraq war, we were blind-sided by a sucker punch delivered by the President and the US Senate on immigration reform.  As we recovered from the devastating blow, we heard a standing eight count and mercifully we were saved by the bell as the first round of the already infamous 'immigration reform' fight came to a close.  The Senate, astounded themselves by our negative reaction, were forced to abandon their plan to sneak this shamnesty plan by the American people with little or no real debate and postponed the vote until after the Memorial Day recess.

The conservative Republican base, now feeling politically more like one of Andrew Luster's date rape victims, struggled to regain their bearing and self-respect.  Unflattering epithets like betrayal, treason, sellout and dereliction of duty, formerly reserved for his lowness slick Willy, now echoed throughout the rank and file of Bush's last bastion of political support.  Our former Commander in Chief was quickly demoted to rank of his notorious predecessor as Traitor in Chief.  We now sounded like spiteful Democrats as we ruthlessly demagogued him.  Why would Bush betray his last bastion of political support, we asked?  Why would he turn on those who had stood by him through the thick and more recently thinner political fortunes?  We were not surprised when the Chappaquiddick Kid emerged as one of the ring leaders of the new Democratic voter registration bill.  But why would our Republican Senators sign on to this monstrosity?  We expect this betrayal of principle by the Democrats.  We were genuinely shocked by the quisling Republicans.  A rude awakening it was indeed and it marked the end of any political innocence that we might still have left in us.

The obvious questions and unconvincing answers emerged like ants at a picnic.  Why were our borders left unsecured in the first place?  Don't they want to protect us?  After 9/11 you would think this would be a top priority.  The oxymoron of the Department of Homeland Security goaded me to redefine my concept of national security.   Why has there been virtually no enforcement of our current immigration laws?  Why are employers allowed to hire illegals indiscriminately without fear of retribution or penalties by the government.  With a total of 800 miles of fence scheduled to be built, why had they built only two miles in the last 6 months?  At that rate the fence will be completed in the year 2207 and all of Mexico could have scampered unmolested across the border by then.  People are inclined to assign all of these failures to governmental incompetence.  However I have become aware of something that changed my opinion as to why this situation exists.  I hope it will change your mind and make you aware of what a dire situation our Republic really is in.

As I searched the internet for information about illegals I came across an article called Former Employees File RICO Lawsuit Against Swift & Co.  As you may remember last December the INS arrested 1300 illegal employees of Swift & Co., the largest meat packing company in the US.  A class action RICO lawsuit was filed on behalf of 18 of the employees who claimed that Swift had "conspired to manipulate and depress the labor market and wages by hiring illegal immigrants."  In January a federal judge came to Swift's rescue and dismissed the case.  So you may ask yourself, 'what's the beef' here?  Well, I did another search and I found a similar class action RICO lawsuit has been filed in Georgia against Mohawk Industries, the carpet manufacturing giant.  The eleventh circuit refused to dismiss this case outright and the decision to proceed with it is now under appeal.  It is evident to me and I hope it is becoming clear to you that this is a major threat to the business giants that hire illegals intentionally and make millions in profits because of the lower labor costs.  There may be other RICO predicate lawsuits being filed elsewhere but this is sufficient for me to see what is happening here.  Coincidentally both of Georgia's Republican Senators, Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson, who previously paid lip service to the conservative Republican position of tough immigration laws and border enforcement, have now signed onto the new shamnesty bill.  What they voted against last year they are now voting for this year.  What made them change their minds?

Now we have to ask, why would big business be in favor of legalizing immigrant workers?  After all, are not they the ones that primary benefit from this cheap labor?  You would think that they would be the ones to support the 'status quo', to borrow a talking point from the sellout Senators.  Well to me, the answer to this question became painfully clear.  If these illegals are allowed to become legal quickly, then the employers are off the hook (hence the 24 hour approval of the Z-Visa).  They cannot be prosecuted for hiring illegals and the millions of their hard earned profits are secure and safe from class action labor cases.  They are free from the looming threat of these very costly RICO lawsuits.  All they have to do is loose one and the door to the barn is open, so to speak, and the Big Businesses all across America who hire illegals will be vulnerable to prosecution.

This article published in the Atlanta Journal Constitution, primarily a liberal rag, shows not only the support of big business in GA for this so called 'immigration reform bill', but that they have formed a new high powered lobby call GEIR and are actively lobbying the Senate for it's passage.  This powerful group is so new that it's membership is still secret.  It was no doubt formed in the wake of the class action Mohawk RICO lawsuit.

Georgia agri-business lines up behind Chambliss, Isakson on immigration reform

"Just got off the phone with Wayne Lord, a vice president for governmental affairs with Pilgrim’s Pride, the largest chicken company in Georgia, and the United States as well.  He’s up in Washington, trying to build support for the immigration reform package now being debated in the U.S. Senate.  Lord is also chairman of Georgia Employers for Immigration Reform, a group of 25 or so major businesses that are backing the play of U.S. Senators. Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson, who helped negotiate the bipartisan compromise.  The group is one of the reasons the two Georgia feel comfortable sticking their necks out on this highly volatile issue.  “All of us as business leaders are very grateful for the leadership of senators Chambliss and Isakson,” Lord said."

This group is one of many Big Business interests lobbies that have signed on to 'immigration reform.  I would go so far as to suggest that they in fact are the primary movers behind this 'employer amnesty' bill and the reason that the Senate is in such a hurry to get it passed.   They are the ones that would benefit the most from amnesty under this bill.  I have no specific information of how these lobbies have managed to change the minds of our Senators but it is obvious to me that they have done just that.  Immigration bill picks up support from businesses.

The incredible irony of this shamnesty bill is that we have immigration rights lobbies and Big Business employer lobbies both working to ram this bill through the Senate.  Another irony is that both political parties have sold out their base constituency to get the compromised legislation through.  The Republicans have sold out their conservative constituency to big business interests and the Democrats have sold out their traditional labor and blue collar constituency to big business and immigration interests.  The executive branch completes the triumvirate of the complete sellout by indulging both immigration amnesty and big business.  Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., derisively refers to them as "the masters of the universe."

So money talks and everything else walks across the border in the US Senate these days.  There use to be a great deal of concern about the number of companies exporting their factories to Mexico and China to benefit from the surplus of cheap labor there.  Now big business has found it is easier to move the workers than to move the factories.  This way they can maintain the pretense that they are still supporting American business growth.

So the unfortunate and painful but very simple answer to my earlier question is, the reason this situation exists, is that big business controls big government and they have no desire to close the borders, to protect America or to protect our jobs.  They are for open borders and cheap labor and we are 'open for business'  because it is 'good for the economy stupid.'  As long as it's good for the economy it's good for everybody.  The Senate's moral principles are subverted by their allegiance to the principle of profit only.  National Security issues are not the priority of our Senate anymore.

I paraphrase a quote from Shakespeare's Hamlet, something does indeed stink in the US Senate.  It is the stench of elitist powerful rich corporations buying support from our elected officials and betraying the foundation of our Republic and our representative form of government.  President Bush and the majority of both parties in the US Senate have been bought and paid for by Big Business.  Any pretense at debate or discussion is a forgone conclusion.  If Chambliss and Isakson had not made up their minds already why did they publish a joint editorial in the AJC recently lauding and promoting the bill?  Their minds are already made up for them by GEIR and other business interests.  Sen. Chambliss holds firm on immigration reform bill.  They even seek to convince us that our economy is dependent solely on cheap Mexican labor.  They are attempting to create a new slave class to serve their interests. 

It seems to me that the only real question left for America is - has the House been bought as well?   The Senators feel they can weather the intense opposition from their constituents who are clearly against this bill.  They arrogantly believe they can deceive us and we will be dissuaded.  I can assure you Shameless Saxby will be the former US Senator when he comes up for re-election in 2008.  Would to God we could recall both him and Isakson, who is safely ensconced in his Senate seat until 2010.  Petition to Recall GA US Senators Chambliss and Isakson.

We can only hope the House will be our last line of defense.  Being re-elected every two years makes them a little more attentive to the voters that elected them.  If the House does not hold, I fear for the future of our great Republic.  Immigration Gate will dwarf any previous scandal of corruption.  Who shall we turn too?  Who can we rely on in our government anymore?  Can the House impeach the Senate and President?  Is the House itself unimpeachable in this scandal?  How many others in the House are corrupt and un-convicted like John Murtha?  If big business interests can buy and control our elected officials, then our representative form of government is a sham and what is left is just a pretense of a representative democracy.


There should be NO AMNESTY for the President or any politician that supports this Faustian pact that compromises America's national security or our unique cultural heritage and destiny.



          Semper Fidelis

This is my take on the new 'Illegal Citizenship Giveaway Bill' being proposed by the 'Quisling US Senate'.

quisling n. A traitor who serves as the puppet of the enemy occupying his or her country.

The article linked below is an indication of just how big a betrayal of America this newly proposed immigration bill really is.  Even as the George Soros funded radical left-wing organization Moveon.org has been the driving political force behind the democratic party's willingness to embrace defeat in Iraq.  Now 'La Raza' and MALDEF, as well as numerous other 'Latina rights' groups, have become the go to lobby for the democrats in the sellout of America.   That is what I think this new 'Illegal Citizenship Giveaway Bill' really is.  Both the democrats and republicans have made a faustian pact by betraying America for political compromise.

All I can say is America, we better wake up, or we will soon lose our unique national heritage, culture and identity.  Instead of assimilating another culture into America's melting pot, we will be absorbed into the lowest common denominator of Mexican and Latina culture and everything that it represents.  Do you think Mexico is a nice place to live?  Who do you know that is moving down there?  It is a land of corrupted politicians and peasants.  The ruling elite and the worker class.

What are the Democrats after here? 

Millions of new registered democratic voters.  When you consider just how close the recent elections have been, what do you think this will do to the balance of power?  Senators Kennedy and and Reid will become the proud patron sponsors of an entire new generation of democratic voters.  Just how long will that take?   It may take 5 or 10 or even 15 years, but if this bill passes it will happen.  How many illegals will be granted citizenship?  Who knows under this current plan?  Let's say 10 million elect to become citizens, which this bill will allow.  Then each of them brings 3 to 5 relatives into America under the current version of this bill.  Now we are looking at 30 to 50 million new voters that are beholden to the democratic party.  Add in all the children they have and we are easily looking at 100 million.  Personally, I think that is a conservative estimate.  This would be the cultural equivalent for America of the sacking of Rome by the barbarians in 410 AD.

Do they love America?  Do they support America?  The unfortunate fact is that most are from an ignorant and underprivileged class that are treated like serfs in Mexico.  They envy America and what we have.  Think I'm wrong about that?  Why do they wave the Mexican flag at their protests?  It's not for the love of America.  Why should they be granted citizenship if they don't meet any of the requirements to be a citizen of America?  The anti-American sentiments are well documented and on display here and in Mexico.  There were even cheers for Osama Bin Laden at some recent soccer matches.  Most of them do not like us at all.  They like our money and jobs but that is about it.

What are the Republican's after here?

I'm appalled that Bush would try to do this to the country.  Perhaps he is only interested in his legacy.  It appears to me that he wants to establish some kind of new world order.  One that breaks down our borders and our unique sense of American identity and establishes a 'new international order'.  At least that will be the end result.  Either that or he really is as stupid as his many political detractors claim.  As a president, he has been a miserable failure when it comes to our own border security and immigration.  He didn't have any trouble starting a war in Iraq but he can't build a fence to secure our own borders. 

The republican leadership has been bamboozled and deceived by the democrats in this bill.  Perhaps the republicans think they will get some political leverage with 'Latina voters' by being perceived as being 'immigration friendly'.   What they are really getting is the shaft by the democrats and America is being betrayed by both parties.  The republicans are being completely out maneuvered politically.  They are being played in this game like a bunch of political amateurs.  They have gotten only token concessions about the fence and certain restrictions on visas but these things can be changed and modified in the future to be weaker.  Already Pelosi and 'La Raza' are lobbying for the easing of restrictions on entrance visas for the families of this new class of 'illegal citizenship' and Bush has removed the back taxes provision.

No matter what Bush and the republican leadership think they are achieving with this bill, the end game will be the decimation of the GOP as a viable political force in American politics.  Is Bush out to destroy the GOP?  Did he have an ulterior motive in getting us distracted with Iraq so he could pull off this immigration coup?  Are we the ones taking our eye off the ball?  Is he just trying to guarantee that his rich buddies will have an endless supply of cheap Mexican labor?  I really don't have all the answers but unfortunately after seeing this quisling at work, we now have to ask ourselves these painful questions.  We have watched him subvert and betray conservative values since he was elected.  He behaved like a big spending liberal and we turned our eye and hoped for the best.  I feel personally betrayed by this man and the republican leadership supporting him.  I expected this from the democrats.  I did not expect it from the republicans too.

What does the bill do for our border security?

This bill does not solve our border security problems.  This is the most critical issue here.  The solution for that is very simple.  Build a fence and man it with enough personnel to STOP ALL ILLEGAL CROSSINGS.  Stop prosecuting border agents that enforce the law.  Enforce the current laws and round up all illegals and send them back to Mexico.  Almost 6 years after 9/11 neither party has shown the political will or courage to do this.  Why?  It's very simple.  They are both more interested in currying the growing political favor of 'Latina voters.'  It is a fast reproducing culture that likes to have babies.  They are a growing political power.  That should be evident in the amount of power they have been given by the Democrats in writing this immigration bill.  This is what happens when liberals emphasize ethnic background over an American national identity.   They put their 'Latina'  identity and priorities before being Americans first.  And during this lapse in judgement (I'm being very kind here), how many terrorists have snuck across the Mexican border into America?  How many Americans will have to die when they are given the order to attack because the 'Quisling US Senate, Congress and the President' do not have the will or courage to defend us?

One other group that has been very active in this immigration fight is the Catholic Church.  Many leaders have come out openly saying they will harbor and protect illegals from being apprehended.  It is pretty clear what they are after here.  They need to fill the dwindling numbers in the pews.  The Catholic church is an integral part of Mexican culture and they will bring great numbers and money into the coffers of the church.  So they are willing to break the laws of the land to serve God and mammon.

Will we be able to save America from this new barbarian horde?  Call or write your US Senator now and let them know there will be no amnesty for any republican or democratic politician that supports this bill.  Tell them to vote No for this bill or we will vote them out of office.  This is a serious and critical national issue.  This problem has been kicked down the road for some 30 years by the politicians.  If this bill is passed we will not be able to turn back the clock on the ibomb (as Savage called it).  The detonation will destroy the fabric of American culture as we know it.  There is not much time left for you to act.  The clock is ticking.  This ibomb can still be stopped.  Do not let these quisling politicians deceive you about what is happening here.  The disinformation campaign and political spin machine is churning at full tilt.  Look at the big picture of what they are trying to do here.  You can get lost in all the details about this provision and that.  They have prepared for months and they are trying to sneak this monstrosity of a bill past the American people at the midnight hour, behind closed doors, without even having a fair national debate.  They do not have the right to destroy America.

We can stop them here before it is passed.  This is America's Thermopolyae.  We have the political power to do it.  If this bill becomes law the floodgates of immigration will be opened.  It is not a question of being a democrat or republican.  It is a question of being an American.  This is what it means to me to be an American citizen.  This should be a government of the people, by the people and for the people of America and not Mexico.  This bill does nothing for legal American citizens except betray them.  Do it for yourself, do it for your country, and do it for the next generation of Americans.


Ezekiel 33:7 - So thou, O son of man, I have set thee a watchman unto the house of Israel; therefore thou shalt hear the word at my mouth, and warn them from me.

---

---

INVASION USA
'La Raza' has virtual veto over bill
 


          Semper Fidelis

With the loss of the Vietnam War already to their credit, the defeato-cratic leadership smells blood and works tirelessly for another defeat of America.  "I never met an American soldier that I didn't want to stab in the back."




      

Our Orphaned Middle East Policy - Things are looking up as everyone starts jumping ship.

— Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. He is the author, most recently, of A War Like No Other. How the Athenians and Spartans Fought the Peloponnesian War.




          Semper Fidelis

Recently I was wondering if anybody in Washington really cared about our Marines and soldiers fighting in Iraq.  They are still over there fighting and bleeding and dying for our country and for our freedom while the COWARDS IN CONGRESS play politics and stab them in the back.   The defeat-o-crats wrap themselves in the American flag and in their blind self-righteous defeatism proclaim, "this war is lost."  Really Sen. Reid?  The only people I see ready to quit are you and the clueless politicians in Washington. Our Marines are not quitting. Not after shedding their blood to make a difference in Iraq and for America and the world.  They are not blind and stupid and they understand the military and political significance of their mission. The blood of our American patriots cries out for  validation from the sands of Iraq.  The only relevant question is, how will America respond?

I haven't seen any troops surrendering and giving up or waving white flags on the news.  They are well equipped and well fed and cared for.  Better than any American soldiers in any previous wars.  Their morale is high and they are committed to winning.  Their main concern (other than staying alive), is the politicians in Washington who seem ready to surrender to the enemy on their behalf and stab them in the back once again while proclaiming how much "they care for the troops."  If that happens then the 3200+ lives lost so far will have been in vain.  Who gave a bunch of politicians sitting behind their desks in Washington the authority to tell the enemy that they have won and we are surrendering?  It is the single most disgraceful thing that I could ever hear a US Senator utter during a time of war.  This fool is suppose to be the leader of the Senate?  He ought to hang himself in shame.

It is the very acne of immoral and irresponsible national behavior for politicians to commit our troops to a war and then abandon them because it gets a little tough or they think it is politically convenient.  Just how far do they plan on retreating?  All Americans should be outraged at this behavior.  If they are not then I have to question if they really know what it means to be an American.  Has the great history of American sacrifice in the world gone unnoticed?  Our freedom was bought with a price. Many patriots have paid that price with their lives.  The soldiers fighting and dying in Iraq are paying the ultimate price.  Everyone there is a volunteer.  No one was drafted.  They are dedicated, committed and all we have to do is support them.  To me that seems the easy part - so why is it so hard for some?

If you find what I write here offensive then perhaps this will be a much needed wake up call.  How many 9/11's do we need to experience before we learn our lesson?  To give up and retreat is not a solution.  To give Iran and al Qaeda a military and political victory in Iraq is not a solution.  We paid for that ground with our blood and now we should just give it up?  That is insane and frankly speaking shameful.  If we quit and leave does anyone really think they will quit too?  Our national security should not be based on policies of wishful thinking.  The terrorists will not stop until we have made so many martyrs of them that they finally get tired of getting killed.  That is what war is.  They declared war on us - not the other way around.  They are not like these willy nilly politicians that say one thing to get elected and do another once when they are in office.  They are dedicated to jihad and right or wrong - they believe in what they are doing and are willing to fight and die for it.  The same cannot be said for our elected politicians.

The lack of vision as to why we are fighting in Iraq is undermining the base of support at home.  There are many reasons for this.  It doesn't really matter how we got there.  The fact is that we are there and so is the enemy.  The battle lines are drawn and what really matters now is how we leave.  The radical left and pacifist anti-war groups have played their part in sowing the seeds of doubt about the cause and 'morality' of this war.  The dishonest and lying anti-war terrorist friendly media has affected our perception of what is really happening there.  The political opportunists in Washington are like cannibals turning and eating their own for political survival and advantage.  These are the ones that sent them into this war and now think they can just change their minds for political convenience.  Our troops are still in this war and I figure if they can still fight and bleed and die then the least I can do is write a few words on their behalf.  I'm fed up with all the whining and lying that is going on in Washington.  I'm disgusted with the back stabbing political opportunists.  If anyone believes that pulling out our troops and throwing Iraq to the wolves is a solution then they are just naive wishful thinking fools.  How much peace will that really buy us and how will it solve the root of this problem which is radical Islamic terrorism?  And what about all the decent Iraqi people that depend on us to protect them from the thugs and terrorists?  Leaving Iraq now would be the moral equivalent of a late term abortion or even infanticide.  The newborn flame of freedom in Iraq needs to protected and nourished or it will be extinguished by the violent hatred of the extremists.

I'm not going to cut and run.  I'm not going to lay down and give up or surrender my country, America, to the insanity of defeatism.  I'm not going to appease or compromise with the absolute evil that we find in Islamic terrorism.  There is no honorable alternative to victory here.  Anybody that believes otherwise is just self deceived.  This appeasing and retreating political nonsense is a joke that is really not funny at all.  Every patriot that has fought and died for America since 1776 is looking down on this generation and wondering if they will ever wake up and cut through the dense fog of malaise and self-doubt and cynical pessimism that is crippling our faith in ourselves and our ability to fight as one Nation Under God.

If you want to be an ally of our enemies.  If you want to enable and empower the Islamic terrorists.  If you want to see America defeated in Iraq then support the insanity of defeatism shown by Sen. Harry Reid in Washington.  The blood of our modern day patriot heroes will be on your hands and like Pontius Pilate you will find that it is not easy to wash your hands clean.  "Out damm spot" you may say but I fear that the stain of a defeat in Iraq will bring immeasurable destruction and far reaching negative consequences to America and the world.  My fears are well justified because "I know my enemy."  The pure hatred for America found in these extremist is so intense it ought make your hair stand up on the back of your neck.

Now is the time to fight.  Now is the time to win.  Now is the time to lay the axe to the root of the problems in the Middle East, the birthplace of Islamic terrorism.  The question is, does this generation of Americans have the stomach and the will and the desire and the vision to win and be victorious?  The fate of America and the world's freedom hangs in the balance.  A line is literally drawn in the sand.  You may feel tired and worn out by this war as it drags on but let me ask you a simple question.  How do you think those Marines in Ramadi feel every night when they hit the rack?  If they have the strength and the will and the desire to do their difficult job then I can guarantee you that I will do mine without complaint.  Our job is to support them here at home and watch their backs.  They don't need to be protected from the terrorists.  They have will continue to win every engagment.  They need to be protected from the self-centered politicians in Washington that are willing turn them into sacrificial lambs in their blind lust for political power.   Like starving vultures they feed off the bodies of our fallen patriots.

It is our destiny as Americans to fight this war and win.  You may not want to fight it and you may pray, "if it be they will O Father, let this cup pass from me."  But if we as Americans have any honor left in us, and even just a spark of the fire of freedom burning in our hearts, then we can and will rise to the occasion.  God has given us everything we need to win, including the brave soldiers.  All we need now is for you to do your part and tell these idiots in Washington that we will not accept their lunatic asylum defeatism any longer.  We will not allow them to betray our soldiers for their political gain.  Our troops need your help.  The situation is very dire. These weasels need to be run out of town on a rail and given a one way ticket back home to wherever they came from.

I have only one more thing to say to Sen. Harry Reid and the rest of the retreat defeat carrion in Washington. 

If you do not stand behind our soldiers then please feel free to stand in front of them!

This video is a great tribute to young Marine that gave his life in taking back 'the worst city in the world', Ramadi, from the terrorists.  I ask you to watch it and consider what his life given in this war means for you and then honor the sacrifice that he and many other real heros have made in Iraq.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6Y9qihLAEA&mode=related&search=

"No man has a greater love than this, that he lay down his life for his friends."


          Semper Fidelis

There is really no need to say much about this defeatocrat except.... that he is one big chickens*#t!



     


         Semper Fidelis

The current intellectual reason given for opposing the war in Iraq by the anti-war liberal democrats, is that it's immoral.  Because it's immoral they feel that "we just can't win" and we should quit the effort and "bring the troops home" therefore losing by default.   They can then pontificate with great all knowing liberal condescension and say, "see, I told you so."   What was the famous phrase?  "Peace with Honor."   In their eyes this retreat will solve all our problems.  We should just leave Iraq and like Vietnam, allow it to be taken over by our enemies.  At best we can expect Iran, Syria and al Qaeda will move in and set up new terrorist training camps and we will be right back where we started from or worse.  The result of our leaving Vietnam was that millions of people perished by the sword.  Now the liberals suggest that leaving Iraq will solve ours problems,  as if there were none there before we invaded.  This is very short sighted.  They seem oblivious to the consequences of the power vacuum that we would leave there.  What message does this send to the world, both our friends and allies, and our enemies.  

Coincidentally this is similar to how we abandoned Afghanistan in 1988 and we all know how that lead directly to the Taliban takeover and resulting disaster of 9/11.  My question is this; how is that moral?  How is it moral to insure that the lives of thousands of brave young men who paid the ultimate price were in vain?  How is it moral to abandon the millions of good people in Iraq that voted for democracy and desire to live in peace and freedom.  But this is your liberal morality, not your traditional morality.  It is a progressive, not a lasting or even honest morality.  It is devoid of reason or an understanding of our history.  The democrats hope to seize power again by betraying America in her time of great need.  How is it moral to vote for a war and commit our troops into battle and then, because it is politically convenient, to change their minds and claim they were mislead by the president and work to undermine the mission and our success?  To me this is the epitome of immoral behavior at the national level.  To undermine your own country and insure it's defeat so you gain political advantage.  It is unbridled and unprincipled political ambition.  We used to call that treason.  Of coarse they justify this because they have convinced themselves that "the war is immoral."

I'm an American and I'm for winning this war.  I will not being deceived into thinking that because it is now politically convenient to define it as immoral, that will justify us quitting.  How is it moral to abandon our own soldiers on the field of battle and encourage our enemies to fight harder?  How is it moral to go to war and decide to quit because it is too tough?  How is it moral to show our enemies that we can't unite as Americans for our own national security?  How is it moral to allow a country like Iran to develop weapons of mass destruction and harbor terrorists and supply weapons that kill our soldiers?   How is it moral to play into our enemies hands and be an instrumental part of their victory?  The fact is - that the terrorists cannot win this war without the help of the democrats.  Therefore they have put a plan into motion to use them to achieve their long term goals.  They learned from Vietnam how to defeat America politically.  They use the democrats to help them to drive us out of Iraq and Afghanistan and thereby humiliate America and extinguish the infant flame of freedom in the arab world.  So far with the help of their best  and most reliable allies, the democrats, they are succeeding.

If we had found the weapons in Iraq, would the liberals be supporting Bush now?  I doubt it.  If we had found them, would that have justified our war against Saddam?  They thought so before the war.  Why then,  is it not justification for taking action against Iran now?  If it was a threat then why is it not a threat now?  All the liberals can say is that the threat from Iraq it was made up and Bush lied, etc, etc.  Well now we have a bunch of certifiable lunatics in Iran(the crazy mullahs), who say they are building a nuke and they will destroy the west and Israel and the appeasing liberals don't have the moral integrity to do anything about it.  All they can do is lie and try to claim that Bush is starting another war.  What's up with this bunch of progressive liars?  Don't they see how that position shows how weak we are as a nation and how it encourages our enemies to continue to fight harder and kill more of our soldiers?  The liberals have maneuvered themselves into a corner where the only thing they can do is raise a flag of surrender and appease our enemies.  How is that moral?  Are the liberals so blind that they can swallow this camel of defeat and choke on the gnat of victory?

These are just a few questions that I have for the retarded anti-war liberal democrats that claim they have all the solutions to the current crises.  "Lets Just lose."  "Let just quit."  "We can't win."  And my all time favorite, "there is no military solution to the problem."  Well let me tell you something my liberal enemies, the terrorists are not as stupid as you are.  They are using terrorist military and political tactics to defeat us.  They are not quitters like the democrats.  What a bunch of crybabies these liberal losers are.  They are a disgrace to our national heritage.  Every time the democrats pull off one of their political stunts it is another big morale boost for the terrorists and those countries that still support them.   

To a reasonable person it should be obvious that if this war can be lost militarily then it can be won as well.  Every battle ever fought could either be won or lost.  It depended on the will and effort put into it.  There is no battle in our history that was ever won easily.  The cost of victory is always high.  In most major battles the outcome has hung in the balance.  Often it was the leadership of just one person that made the difference and tipped the scales in favor of victory.  It is unlikely that a team in any sport, that takes the field of endeavor believing they will lose, will win the contest.  If you do not fight with all your heart, believing you will be victorious you will not win.  It is so fundamental that I shouldn't even have to explain it.  Every High School football coach knows the basics of the psychology of victory.  But we are dealing with the politically retarded liberals here who seem to be unable to learn.  Defeatism is such an entrenched mentality in liberals today that the concept of victory has been eradicated from their vocabulary.  

This is not the right stuff that Washington showed at the battle of Yorktown.  This is not the right stuff that won at Gettysburg and preserved the Union.  This is not the right stuff that won the day at Normandy or Iwo Jima or the Battle of the Bulge or the Philippines or even the disastrous Italian campaign.  I could go on and on but the retarded liberals refuse to learn from our history.  The pervading defeatist mentality of the anti-war liberals is un-American.  Losing and leaving Iraq will be the greatest mistake ever made in our nation's history.  Millions will die and if we survive, history will look back in and wonder and amazement at how an entire generation of Americans could be so short-sighted and blind.  Yes, sacrifices must be made and more American soldiers will die but I would rather lose 10,000 now than a million in 5 or 10 years from now.  This war is not going away so why don't we go ahead and win it now while we have the army there to do it with.  Politicians always leave us with another war to fight.  Why don't we fight it now while we have the troops and the enemy is engaged.  If they need more troops then send more.  If we need a bigger army then create one.  Whatever it takes to win this war is what we need to do.  No matter what the cost.  The cost now will be smaller than if we procrastinate and believe the lie that it will just go way.  The cost of victory now is much smaller then the cost of defeat.

I am not a retarded anti-war, liberal, defeatist democrat and I refuse to surrender my country to this insanity.

          Semper Fidelis

These pictures are from a recent "peace rally" held in Portland, Oregon.  They burned an effigy of an American soldier and the American flag.  What a disgusting bunch of confused idiots.  "Useful idiots" is what the Soviets used to call them.  However as stupid as they are, you cannot under estimate how dangerous they are to our national resolve.  They are like a cancer that has infected the land.  This is the radical left that drives the anti-war movement of Democratic party.






























They have openly abandoned the pretense that "though we oppose the war, we still support the troops."  Only a left wing liberal hypocrite could believe such superficial nonsense.  They have done everything they could to undermine our troops and the President and at the same time, assist our enemies

Americans?  They look a lot like the terrorists that we are fighting......and they act like them too.  Same rhetoric and propaganda.  Except for their attire they could be a mob in Pakistan.  I especially like the big smile on the guys face.  A real high point of his life I'm sure.






























This is the enemy within.  They are a bigger threat than the terrorists in my opinion.  Because they threaten to undermine the ability of our nation to defend itself against the real enemy of western civilization.  Terrorism is the real threat to our civilization, not global warming that the false prophet Al Gore would have us believe.  Since they lack both the courage and common sense to recognize this, I can only assume they are all brain dead.  They undermine our national resolve and ability to fight and win this war.  They help only our enemies.  Apparently they would rather be Moslem slaves than a free people.  That is the choice we are ultimately faced with.

These photos were posted at the site below.  The person that posted them seems to not support this.  I'm grateful they posted them because the terrorist /liberal friendly media never would.

http://linfield.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2012088&id=65201211&l=c6305.



        Semper Fidelis

This case against our Marines is a travesty.  We sent them into battle to fight a cowardly enemy that hides behind women and children.  Tragically some were killed.  The terrorists use these tactics purposely to create civilian casualties.  They then use it as a propaganda tool against us.  They have no trouble finding willing accomplices amongst our terrorist friendly media.  Now these Marines are facing an Article 32 hearing with the prospect of being court-martialed for serving their country and doing their duty.  Abandoned by the country they loved and the Corps that they faithfully served, they are sacrificial lambs for a politicized country that seeks vengeance.  The liberal lynch mob, led by an ex-Marine Officer and now corrupt Congressman Jack Murtha, has the unmitigated gall to "publicly accused the four Marines of being “cold-blooded murderers” and high ranking officers of “covering it up.” Murtha is the same person caught on tape negotiating bribes with Arab Sheiks during the FBI’s 1980 Abscam investigation—he was an un-indicted coconspirator in that case."   I'm not going to cover all the facts pertaining to the Haditha case as you can read about them in the linked article below.  Rest assured that you will not find them in Time Magazine or any other liberal propaganda outlet.

The liberal democrats proclaim, "Oh, we have learned the lessons of Vietnam and now we support the troops."  Oh really?  How is that?  By accusing them of crimes and pronouncing their guilt even before the investigation is complete?  By undermining the authority of the President to conduct this war by attacking his character with outright lies.   By the parroting enemy propaganda to our own anti-American media?  By stating publicly that our soldiers lives are wasted?  By embracing a defeatist mentality that says "we can't win in Iraq, we just can't win militarily"?  By collaborating with a hostile liberal-biased media that never questions the conduct of an immoral and cowardly enemy that uses terrorist tactics to kill innocent civilians, but constantly gives both real and made up charges against American troops full front page headlines.  That uses enemy propaganda and lies to attack our own national policies?  By revealing publicly, the secrets of classified information of how we operate to defeat our terrorist enemies?  By threatening to cut off funding for our troops while they are engaged in battle with the enemy?   And the media religiously reports our casualty numbers while never mentioning how many of the enemy are killed by us.  This is the conduct of an enemy within.  A fifth column of spineless, liberal cowards and traitors and saboteurs.  And what is their motive?  Just plain old political power?  Who is gullible enough to believe all this nonsense?  Apparently many still are.

The government is using 70 investigators to bring charges against these Marines.  The Marines Corps, bowing to political pressure, seems to have lost it's own soul.   To appease the Gods of a hostile media they have commenced proceedings to forsake their own.  It's akin to child sacrifice.  What has happened to the integrity of the Marine Corps?  What happened to the creed "no man left behind"?  What happened to the motto "once a Marine always a Marine"?  I'm talking to you Jack Murtha!  You politically corrupt hack and traitor!  What a disgrace to the Marine Corps this repugnant pig is.  The President has neither the moral courage or the will to stop this liberal witch hunt.  Our tax dollars are being used to fund this miscarriage of justice.  These men ought to be decorated as heroes and not persecuted like common criminals.  They were sent into harm's way and watched their brother Marines fall in combat.  They reacted to the situation as they were trained to do.  And we as a country are so conscious-less, as to let them be charged as criminals?  Is this how we treat our bravest and noblest warriors today.  Those who have survived the crucible of combat and have bled for their country.  Their blood in cries out for justice in sands of Iraq.  What message does this send to those troops still serving today?  To those who would serve in the future?  This is how the liberal democrats "support the troops".  By today's standards you have to help the enemy in anyway possible in order to be a patriot.  That is the new liberal democratic Patriot's Creed.  As long as you don't pick up a weapon and actually shoot our own soldiers in the back, your still a patriot.  What a bunch of idiots.  You leave the dirty work to the terrorists.  Like Pontius Pilate you may wash your hands.  But I tell you their blood is on your conscience.

Is there no man or woman in the government in America today with any spine left?  With moral courage or fortitude or any common sense at all?  Is there no one willing to stand up to the the self-proclaimed liberal Gods of the media?   Are they forever going to be the tail that wags the dog?  Is their hatred of the military going to be the Achilles heal of America's defeat.  Are we going to led into a ditch of national self-destruction by a bunch of infantile, blind, rebellious, liberal hippies from the sixties now donning $1000 tailored suits and patent leather shoes and pretending to be our leaders?  They choose "war heroes" like John Kerry to lead us?  A cowardly back stabbing defeatist loser.  He is an appropriate leader for a bunch of liberal democratic traitors.   Where is our King Leonidas today?  We need some Spartan courage and discipline in the land.  I'll make my stand with King Leonidas and the 300 Spartan warriors at Thermoplyae to defeat the liberal democratic hordes we fight today.

And all the while the Islamo-fascist terrorists laugh and play us like a fiddle as they drive us out of Iraq and Afghanistan and watch us fighting amongst ourselves about the nature of this "immoral and unjust war".  Obviously it's neither immoral or unjust to the enemy nor are they concerned with the issue.  They are the ones that have no qualms about killing innocent men, women and children.  As long as we allow ourselves to be hamstrung by this false litmus test imposed on us by the enemy and their willing liberal accomplices (both the media and the democrats), we are going to get our collective national butts kicked!  Yes, that's right.   We can still loose this war.  And all for the lack of a nail.  That nail is will power and it is our faith that holds it in place.  They are doing everything they can to erode our national faith.  Cynicism, defeatism and nihilism are like a cancer.  The malaise of the Carter years once again sweeps over the land like fog.  Once it infects the body politic it will not stop until it has destroyed the host or it has been surgically removed.  It ought be clear to any reasonably thinking American, that if we can lose this war then we can also win it.  But in order to win it, we must first fight it.  In order to fight it effectively we must remove the cancer of defeatism that has infected the land and sapped us of our national will to win.

Haditha is symptomatic of the disease of liberalism infecting America today.  It makes us weak.  It is a self-righteous hypocritical standard imposed by the radical left on America.  It has nothing to do with the reality of the difficult situation our soldiers are facing in combat.  It is based on fanciful self-delusion.  It is an unrealistic standard.  It plays directly into the hands of our enemies.  Shortly after Afghanistan the liberal democrats and media began working to undermine this country.  They have used every tactic available to them.  They have attacked the President, the Constitution, and now the people.  They are blinded by their lust for power and will go to any means to achieve it.   With the media as their loyal accomplices the democrats can get away with anything they say.  They are not held accountable.  They have done everything in their power to undermine the confidence and faith of the American people in themselves and in their leaders.  I don't know what you call it but I call it treason and sedition. 

HAVING FAILED TO LEARN THE REAL LESSONS OF VIETNAM THE LIBERALS ONCE AGAIN BECOME THE FOOLS AND THE TOOLS OF OUR ENEMIES, ENABLING THEM TO ACHIEVE A POLITICAL VICTORY OVER US.  They then proceed to pat themselves on the back and laud their own treasonous behaviour.  Like political retards, the liberals are unable to learn from their previous mistakes and they are now up to their same old tricks of betrayal and defeat.  They facilitated the communist victory in Vietnam and now they are trying to do the same for the terrorists.  The only tactic they know is to turn tail and run up a white flag of surrender.  "The dog returns to eat his own vomit" and so do they.

The rules of engagement imposed on today's military would have insured our defeat in WW II.  Playing catch and release with terrorists is insane.  We could not have won on Iwo Jima or Normandy this way.  Nobody was prosecuted for firebombing Dresden or Tokyo where hundreds of thousands of civilians died.  You might as well require Officers and NCOs to have an attorney on retainer while on active duty to protect themselves from the liberal lawsuits.  Should we read terrorists their Maranda rights before we kill them?  It is absurd.  While the terrorists hide in schools and mosques and hospitals and use women and children as shields.  And of coarse the liberals say nothing about this.  The silence is deafening.  This is the same mentality that would not allow the Marines to carry a chambered round in Beirut that resulted in over 250 dead Marines and Sailors in 1983.  It was a major Hezbollah terrorist victory.  It was the true beginning of the war .  Thank you liberal democrats.

The democrats and now many spineless republicans seem bent on achieving the same shameful goal of defeat we suffered in Vietnam.  Oh wait... What are they calling it now?  A fazed redeployment.  "Let's just bring the troops home now....because we support the troops."  What a bunch of political weather vanes.  Twisting their necks into an unrecognizable protuberance while attempting to stay in power.  It has turned into a feeding frenzy for the left-wing democratic defeatist losers like Murtha and Pelosi.  But they say, "Oh, we support the troops."  What a bunch of baloney.....thats what I say!  They are like carrion feeding off the carcasses of our real American heros.  Every time they open up their mouths they are lying and deceiving the American people.  They have done absolutely nothing to support our troops and they have done everything they could to undermine and defeat them.  I'm so disgusted and it makes me want to puke.

These liberals don't have to fight or take up arms or even put themselves in harms way.  If they don't have the stomach for it then let the brave and loyal patriots in the military do that.  They know their duty as citizens and are unafraid in their selfless sacrifices.  All the liberal democrats have to do is support them.  Give them the beans and bullets that they need to win.  Support the country and unite against our common enemies.  What on earth I ask, is so hard about that? 

I say it is time to take these Marines down from the liberal cross of hypocrisy where they hang.  They have suffered long enough.  If the liberals really supported the troops they would not crucify innocent Marines.  May God save us from this insanity because this bunch of weak defeatist left-wing liberal losers never will.

Matthew 18:2 "Woe unto the world because of offenses!  for it must needs be that offenses come; but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh!"

Marine Commander Faces Politically Charged “Haditha” Prosecution; Thomas More Law Center Joins Defense Team


        Semper Fidelis